Politics & Government

LA Residents React To City Council's Decision on Earthquake Retrofitting Costs

We asked Patch readers what they thought about the city council's unanimous decision to allow landlords to split costs with renters.

On Wednesday, January 13 the Los Angeles City Council made a 14-0 decision to have landlords and renters of earthquake-vulnerable buildings to share the costs of retrofitting 50-50.

According to city estimates, there are 13,500 “soft-story” buildings, multi-story apartments with tuck-under parking spaces, and 1,500 brittle concrete buildings that may need to comply to meet the retrofitting requirements.

Under the tentatively approved amendments, landlords are required to cap the pass-through costs at $38 per month.

Find out what's happening in Brentwoodfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

We asked our readers on Facebook if they thought this was a fair deal for landlords and renters. Here’s what you said:

  • “If the renters are given the percentage amount of ownership in the property, then it’s fair. Otherwise the landlord is the big winner once the renter moves out.” - Sherman Oaks
  • “Retrofitting is a cost of doing business. Who knows how long a renter will rent to benefit from the retrofit? It should be a landlord’s cost since he stands to benefit from the retrofit. If the Council wishes to make it easier for the landlord, the government should offer low-cost loans or some sort of subsidy. The renter has no business being involved financially in this permanent building cost.” - Northridge
  • “Nope, I don’t think sharing is fair. This cost should be borne by landlords.” - Studio City
  • “No. Why should a renter assist with capital improvements?” - Highland Park
  • “Nope, because the landlords reap the benefits, since they own the property.”- Sherman Oaks
  • “This decision is shocking, nonsensical and inequitable. If this slanted law comes info effect, does that mean renters will get a share of future profits from renters in that building? Renting out apartments is a business. Why should renters pay for business expenses associated with running it unless they, too, get a share of that business’s profits. To a point, The City, County or Federal Government should help landlords in the event of catastrophic weakening of their buildings.” - Northridge

Have an opinion? Tell us what you think on our Brentwood Patch Facebook page.

Find out what's happening in Brentwoodfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.

More from Brentwood