Politics & Government
Taxpayers Get Involved in 'Turner v. Clayton'
The state of Missouri has 30 days to respond.

Three Clayton taxpayers have filed motions to intervene in the case.
(See related on Patch: and
that the taxpayers argue it's unconstitutional and unenforceable to ask St. Louis Public Schools to pay for student transfers to other school districts. The story notes:
Find out what's happening in Maplewood-Brentwoodfor free with the latest updates from Patch.
The Clayton taxpayers in the case argue that the state of Missouri has not provided any funding to cover the transfer of students from unaccredited districts to accredited ones, a pleading document provided by Tennill states. Further, the taxpayers argue that it would be unconstitutional and unenforceable to ask St. Louis City schools to pay for the transfers, consequently leaving Clayton schools unable to pay.
The full story is .
Find out what's happening in Maplewood-Brentwoodfor free with the latest updates from Patch.
Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.