Politics & Government
Third Ward Councilmember Offers Views On Olive/170 Development
Stacy Clay represents University City's third ward. He supports a proposed development on Olive Boulevard at Interstate 170.
UNIVERSITY CITY, MO β It takes "something large" to stop a degenerative cycle of declining property values, third ward councilmember Stacy Clay says in a new video posted to Facebook Monday β "something large like the Olive and 170 development."
Do you agree? To submit an op-ed on the proposed Olive development to Patch send pitches to ryne.danielson@patch.com.
To get the latest neighborhood coverage first, subscribe to your local Patch for daily newsletters and breaking news alerts. Interested in blogging with Patch? Find out how here.
Find out what's happening in University Cityfor free with the latest updates from Patch.
Photo by J. Ryne Danielson/Patch
Find out what's happening in University Cityfor free with the latest updates from Patch.
A map of the proposed development:

Catch up before the next public hearing by reading Patch's previous reporting below:
- AG's Office Investigating U. City Over Sunshine Law Complaints
- U. City Will Meet With Stakeholders Ahead Of Next Public Hearing
- Olive/170 Project Raises Hopes And Fears In University City
- TIF Public Hearing Gets Heated In University City
- University City Rejects Sunshine Request For TIF Analysis
- 'Councilwoman Paulette Carr Is On The Warpath': Riverfront Times
- Post-Dispatch Editorial Board Is Opposed To U City TIF
- Watch Live: Public Hearing On Olive Development In U-City
- Watch The April 15 University City TIF Commission Meeting
- Local Government Watchdog Accuses TIF Chairman Of Conflicts Of Interest
- Citizens Call For Community Benefits Agreement Before TIF Vote
- Olive Retail Anchor To Remain Secret Until TIF Is Approved
- Sale Of McNair Building, Eminent Domain Discussed Monday Night
- Mostly White TIF Commission Weighs Fate Of Minority Community
- Councilmember Smotherson Responds To Patch TIF Commission Article
- Olive Development Meeting Scheduled For 6:30 Tonight: Watch Live
- Commentary: Redeveloping The I-170/Olive Interchange Benefits All Of U-City
- Commentary: U. City's TIF Plan: Bad for the 3rd Ward, Bad for Community
Read other coverage here:
- Itβs time to dismantle TIFs as tool of segregation
- University City TIF Plans Worry Olive Boulevard's Immigrant Restaurateurs
- University City divided over TIF financed mixed-use development
- Olive/I-170 redevelopment has potential to benefit University City
- Commentary: Taxpayer largesse unnecessary, wasteful in U City development
- TIF can jump-start U. City neighborhood
- University City's bold redevelopment plans are a win for the city, residents
- University City uses TIF tool responsibly to improve neighborhood
- University City wonβt get built up by tearing thriving parts of it down
- University City isnβt acting in best interests of its existing businesses
- Leave well enough alone; donβt OK big-box proposal in U. City
- University City TIF Proposal Has Residents Fighting Back
- Editorial: University City shouldn't give away $70.5 million for a big box store
- Commentary: University City development proposal mirrors failed Sunset Hills plan
- County Let University City Choose Some Appointees For Commission Weighing $70 Million Big-Box TIF
- University City using $190 million in TIF funds for redevelopment
- TIF Public Hearing Gets Heated In University City (St. Louis American Reprint)
- Developer petitioned for Community Benefits Agreement, U. City has no minority inclusion policy for public-subsidized projects
- Curious Louis: The future of St. Louis' 'unofficial' Chinatown
- University City Big Box Plan Exemplifies All That Is Wrong
- Proposed development could change the texture of University City's gritty back door
- U. City Has A Chance To Be An Innovator On TIF Development
Public documents can be found here:
Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.