Politics & Government
NJ Lawmakers Fight To Limit ICE Powers As Violence Erupts Nationwide
The proposed policies come amid major controversy regarding ICE, both in New Jersey and across the country.
New Jersey lawmakers are pushing back against some agendas of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
Legislators are advocating for new policies that would limit the abilities of ICE in New Jersey and protect the Garden State’s immigrants.
Among the legislation is Bill A6309, introduced by assemblywomen Annette Quijano and Ellen J. Park, which would restrict local law enforcement from disclosing the immigration status of residents to ICE agents within their jurisdiction.
Find out what's happening in Across New Jerseyfor free with the latest updates from Patch.
While the Immigrant Trust Directive policy already regulates this, Bill A6309 would turn the restriction from just a policy into a law.
Another bill, Bill A6310, also introduced by Park, would designate areas including schools, hospitals, shelters, courthouses, and places of worship as locations in which federal civil law enforcement initiatives could not be carried out.
Find out what's happening in Across New Jerseyfor free with the latest updates from Patch.
“Individuals should not be deterred from seeking services for which they are eligible because of a generalized fear of engaging with institutions,” the proposed law reads.
The bill only applies to federal civil law enforcement actions, not to criminal investigations. Bill A6310 would protect not those who have committed a crime, but those who have committed a civil offense, such as being an undocumented immigrant in the United States.
Language in Bill A6310 also prevents state, county, or municipal law enforcement officials from inquiring about their immigration status based “solely on actual or suspected citizenship or immigration status or actual or suspected violations of federal civil immigration law.”
The Supreme Court decided in September, through Vasquez Perdomo v. Noem, that ICE agents were legally allowed to inquire about a person’s immigration status based on how they look, their race, their language, their accent, their place of work, and other factors.
"We are here to protect people, and give equal protection to our immigrants... I want to bring the American Dream for others, and give them the opportunity that I had," Park said. "This bill means a lot; it means the future of not just New Jersey, but the state of America."
The proposed policies have yet to get to the Senate or Assembly, as they still need to go through more committee hearings. If the bills get off both floors, they’ll need to be signed into law by the governor.
Whether that governor is Phil Murphy or Mikie Sherrill depends on when the bills make it off the floor, if they do in the first place. Come Jan. 20, it'll be up to Sherrill to make the call.
What This Means For NJ’s Proposed New ICE Facility
The legislature comes just as a new ICE detention facility is reportedly being planned in Morris County.
According to the Washington Post, a location in Roxbury will become one of several warehouse-turned-detention facilities across the country. Roxbury’s proposed facility is expected to hold around 1,500 people at one time, the Post added.
While Roxbury officials confirmed with Patch that they have not been reached out to by the federal agency regarding the jail, residents wasted no time sharing their opinion on the plan.
Read More: New ICE Facility Proposed In Morris County Sparks Backlash
Around 200 people were seen on Saturday in the heart of Roxbury opposing the rumored facility.
Signs reading “Immigrants Make The Country Great,” and “I Prefer ICE In My Coffee,” were being held as the crowd chanted “No ICE in Roxbury.”
While the Post’s article says that ICE’s construction plans are “subject to change,” it's hard to tell how these new policies, if passed, will affect the warehouse-turned-detention center plan.
Pushback Amid Shooting Controversy
New Jersey’s newest immigration policy proposals came just before an ICE agent killed a woman in Minneapolis, Minnesota, on Wednesday.
An ICE officer shot and killed Renee Nicole Good, 37, an American citizen and Minneapolis local, during a raid on Wednesday afternoon.
Read More: Video Shows ICE Agent Fatally Shooting 37-Year-Old Woman In Minneapolis
Footage shows Good in her car, illegally parked as she tried to wave traffic through a suburban street, being approached by ICE officers. When an agent attempts to enter her car, she drives away in the direction of a second officer, who in turn shoots her three times.
Several camera angles captured the shooting, which is under federal investigation.
A number of leaders across the country were outraged by the shooting, including New Jersey’s next governor.
“The fatal shooting in Minnesota is a tragedy — one that now leaves three young kids without a mother,” Sherrill posted. “I know as a former prosecutor and military veteran that sending armed, masked agents into communities to drive a political agenda does not make us safer, but it instead creates a culture of fear, distrust, and resentment. New Jersey stands against this assault on our Constitution and our values.”
Governor Phil Murphy, who has just days left in his final term, called the incident "horrifying" and said, "Nothing I’ve seen could remotely justify this poor woman losing her life."
More From Patch:
- Driver Shot In Minneapolis Is At Least The 5th Person Killed In US Immigration Crackdown
- NJ Immigrant Detainee Dies In ICE Custody, Sparking Outcry From Advocates
- ICE In NJ Deported 500 People From Country In 3 Months, Feds Say
- Detainee Population Surges At ICE Prison In NJ After It Reopens Under Trump
- Refugee Jailed In NJ Followed Legal Process, Faces Deportation Anyway
Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.