Real Estate

Huge Innovation QNS Rezoning Gets Thumbs-Down From Borough President

The Queens Borough President rejected the enormous Astoria development over affordability concerns, further narrowing its path to approval.

A rendering of Innovation QNS. Queens Borough President Donovan Richards recommended this week that the city reject the five-block rezoning.
A rendering of Innovation QNS. Queens Borough President Donovan Richards recommended this week that the city reject the five-block rezoning. (ODA Architecture/City Planning Commission)

ASTORIA, QUEENS — The transformative Innovation QNS development was rejected by Queens Borough President Donovan Richards on Thursday, who said it would cause an "influx of new residents" that would change the character of Astoria and threaten to displace existing residents.

The eagerly awaited decision is only a non-binding recommendation, but could still influence the fate of the controversial project, which will now go before the City Planning Commission before a likely final vote by the City Council.

Richards's recommendation is the latest blow for the project, which is facing skepticism from the local Council member and opposition from the neighborhood community board.

Find out what's happening in Astoria-Long Island Cityfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

Spanning five blocks between 37th Street and Northern Boulevard, bounded by 35th and 36th avenues, Innovation QNS would construct more than a dozen new buildings on what is now a mostly industrial corner of southern Astoria.

Supporters say it would help alleviate the city's housing crisis by adding 2,800 apartments — including around 700 affordable units — and enliven the neighborhood with new shops, green spaces and a replaced movie theater.

Find out what's happening in Astoria-Long Island Cityfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

Developers have reduced the heights of three buildings and eliminated a tower along 35th Avenue (outlined in black) in an attempt to assuage concerns about development near Astoria's residential core. (Community Board 1/ODA Architecture)

But opponents have alleged the $2 billion project would indirectly displace longtime residents, saying most of the development would be unaffordable for the people who already live in Astoria.

Richards echoed those concerns, saying that "serious discussions" with the developers had not persuaded them to increase the number of affordable units or make the existing apartments more affordable. (Developers disagreed, saying they had promised to up the number of affordable apartments.)

"Today, New York City residents continue to experience a multitude of intersecting crises: housing affordability, food insecurity, evictions, and stagnating wages for the lowest earners," Richards wrote. "Blindly building more market-rate housing will not fix these long-standing, systemic issues."

The market-rate apartments included in Innovation QNS would rent from between $2,430 to $5,190 per month — far above the neighborhood's median gross rent of $1,686. (The affordable units would be priced starting at $598.)

"The influx of new residents who can afford to pay these rents, and the sheer density of the proposed 13 buildings, will drastically alter the character, demographics and housing stability of Astoria and [Community District 1]," Richards said. "Again I ask, who will benefit?"

Richards said the city should reject the project unless developers make a slew of changes, including making half the project affordable and working to get subsidies from the city that would deepen the level of affordability.

"Disappointed"

Tracy Capune, a vice president at Kaufman Astoria Studios, said in a statement that developers were "disappointed" by Richards's recommendation, since they had made "significant progress in addressing the Borough President’s concerns."

Capune said developers had in fact agreed to increase the number of affordable homes and deepen their affordability levels, contrary to Richards's claim that they had refused. But developers did not share any details about what changes had been made.

"We’re proud of the plan for Innovation QNS – a $2 billion investment in creating affordable homes; family-sustaining jobs; open space; support for small businesses, working families and immigrant communities; and hundreds of millions of dollars in public revenue all at a time when it is needed most – and look forward to refining the plan further in collaboration with Council Member Won to ensure it addresses her concerns," Capune said.

City Councilmember Julie Won (left) toured the Innovation QNS site in February with Council land use chair Raphael Salamanca. Won may end up deciding the project's fate once it reaches the Council. (Emil Cohen/NYC Council)

The 13-member City Planning Commission will now have 60 days to review Innovation QNS, and could kill the entire project if most members vote against it. But a rejection is seen as unlikely, meaning the final say will likely belong to the City Council.

There, local member Julie Won will have an outsized influence, assuming her colleagues defer to her wishes when voting on Innovation QNS — a standard practice in the Council. Won has not taken a formal stance on the project, but has criticized its developers for what she viewed as inadequate outreach to neighbors.

Most recently, Won told City Limits this week that Innovation QNS's developers had failed to meet two of the three criteria that she laid out in a new rubric of "land use principles," focused on affordability, community engagement and infrastructure investment.

"I don’t know if it’s too late," Won told the outlet.

A rendering of an open space that would be built as part of Innovation QNS. (Courtesy of Innovation QNS)

Community Board 1 rejected the rezoning in a similar non-binding vote in June. Their no-vote came despite a number of changes made to the plan by developers — a joint team of Silverstein Properties, Kaufman Astoria Studios and BedRock Real Estate Partners — in response to criticism.

That included replacing a proposed school with a community recreation center, withdrawing plans for big-box retail space, and moving the project's tallest buildings toward Northern Boulevard and away from Astoria's residential core.

Related coverage:

Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.

More from Astoria-Long Island City