Politics & Government

Dempsey: Post-2014 Security Agreement Talks Can Move Forward

It isn't necessary to have a decision on an exact number of troops in post-2014 Afghanistan before securing a bilateral security agreement, says the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

By Claudette Roulo
American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON -- It isn’t necessary to have a decision on an exact number of troops in post-2014 Afghanistan before securing a bilateral security agreement, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff told the House Armed Services Committee Thursday.

During a hearing on the president’s proposed fiscal year 2014 defense budget, Army Gen. Martin E. Dempsey said the question of whether the Afghanistan mission will succeed and endure rests on the confidence of the Afghan security forces and of the people of Afghanistan, not on a specific figure for the enduring presence.

Find out what's happening in Fort Braggfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

A range of 8,000 to 12,000 total personnel already is established in NATO agreements, he said. Those personnel are expected to train, advise and assist Afghan forces, Dempsey told the House panel.

“I find that to be a reasonable target toward which to aim,” he added.

Find out what's happening in Fort Braggfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

The effort to secure a bilateral support agreement can move forward based on those numbers, he said, “because that should inform the number of bases we might need to retain and what authorities ... we might need.”

Nor is it tactically necessary to have an exact number, Dempsey noted, because the agreed-upon range supplies enough information to allow the department to define the logistical requirements to retrograde from the current troop level of 34,000 down to “something between 8,000 to 12,000.”

Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.

More from Fort Bragg