Politics & Government
Idaho A.G.'S Supreme Court Appeal Could Obstruct University Of Phoenix Purchase
An appeal could extend the legal battle by several more months.

February 20, 2024
Originally posted on IdahoEdNews.org on February 20, 2024
Find out what's happening in Across Idahofor free with the latest updates from Patch.
A University of Phoenix-related lawsuit appears to be headed to the state Supreme Court.
Attorney General Raúl Labrador filed notice Friday, appealing an open meetings lawsuit against the State Board of Education. The appeal could continue a long-simmering legal fight between Labrador and State Board — and pose another time-consuming obstacle to the University of Idaho’s controversial $685 million plan to acquire Phoenix.
Find out what's happening in Across Idahofor free with the latest updates from Patch.
At issue, once again, is a series of closed-door State Board discussions of the Phoenix purchase. The State Board held three closed executive sessions to discuss the purchase, before endorsing the U of I’s plans in a May 18 meeting. The State Board said the closed meetings fell under a little-used exemption in open meetings law — covering preliminary discussions of a purchase pitting an Idaho agency against out-of-state public bidders.
Ada County District Judge Jason Scott sided with the State Board on Jan. 30, saying the closed-door discussions were legal. In his notice of appeal, Labrador lodges several complaints with Scott’s ruling:
- Scott decided the law’s exemption covered “all negotiations,” not just preliminary talks. Labrador argued that the exemption should be applied as narrowly as possible.
- Scott erroneously sided with the State Board on another key matter: competition. Scott said the State Board “reasonably believed” the U of I was in competition with other public bidders. Labrador’s team has long questioned whether other suitors were in the running for Phoenix — especially after University of Arkansas publicly rejected a purchase in April.
- Scott denied Labrador’s team a jury trial, instead ruling on his own.
A possible appeal comes eight months after Labrador filed his lawsuit.
The timetable isn’t exactly clear, but an appeal could easily extend this legal battle by several more months — just as the U of I and Phoenix are trying to close the deal. The purchase faces a nonbinding May 31 deadline; either side could opt out if a deal isn’t wrapped up by that date.
Labrador’s office and the State Board’s attorneys will have more than two months to file a series of briefs and responses with the Supreme Court. Meanwhile, the court will pull together filings from the District Court case, a process that also is likely to take several weeks.
The Supreme Court could hear the case itself, or refer it to the Idaho Court of Appeals. Either way, the Supreme Court is required to act on a request for appeal, said Nate Poppino, the state’s court communications manager.
The appeal isn’t the only hurdle facing the U of I and Phoenix.
Legislators are looking to put the brakes on the Phoenix purchase. A resolution introduced last week calls on the State Board to reconsider its May 18 decision, and threatens a possible lawsuit.
Meanwhile, a U of I-aligned nonprofit will need to go into the bond market to finance the purchase.
The Idaho Capital Sun, the Gem State’s newest nonprofit news organization, delivers accountability reporting on state government, politics and policy.