U.S. Supreme Court Rejects Texas Suit That Tried To Overturn Election Results

the Louisiana Illuminator

By Ariana Figueroa

December 11, 2020

WASHINGTON—The Supreme Court on Friday turned aside a Texas lawsuit that sought to derail the presidential election results from four battleground states, despite pressure on the justices from President Donald Trump on social media.

“Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections,” according to the unsigned court order. “All other pending motions are dismissed as moot.”

A second paragraph from Justice Samuel Alito that was joined by Justice Clarence Thomas stated: “In my view, we do not have discretion to deny the filing of a bill of complaint in a case that falls within our original jurisdiction. See Arizona v. California, 589 U. S. ___ (Feb. 24, 2020) (Thomas, J., dissenting). I would therefore grant the motion to file the bill of complaint but would not grant other relief, and I express no view on any other issue.”

More than half of the Republicans in the U.S. House—126, with 20 added on Friday after they were left out earlier by a “clerical error”—had signed on to back a brief put forth earlier this week by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton. Paxton sued to invalidate the voting results of Michigan, Georgia, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania.

The new GOP signers included a member of leadership—House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy of California, who joined a push spearheaded by Louisiana Rep. Mike Johnson.

In addition to Johnson, Rep. Steve Scalise, Rep. Clay Higgins and Rep. Ralph Abraham supported the lawsuit. Rep. Garrett Graves did not.

Other Republicans added Friday included Bill Posey of Florida; Doug Collins, Jody Hice and Barry Loudermilk of Georgia; Jim Hagedorn and Pete Stauber of Minnesota; Billy Long of Missouri; Mark Walker of North Carolina; Scott DeJarlais of Tennessee; and Morgan Griffith, Carol Miller and Alex Mooney of Virginia.

Many Republicans in Congress have refused to directly state whether they believe President Donald Trump was defeated by President-elect Joe Biden on Nov. 3. Some have instead said that they support the president’s decision to challenge the election results in the courts.

Paxton alleges that officials in Michigan, Georgia, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania illegally changed voting laws, which caused voting irregularities and changed the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.

Trump made similar allegations on Twitter and on Friday he told the justices what they should do.

“If the Supreme Court shows great Wisdom and Courage, the American People will win perhaps the most important case in history, and our Electoral Process will be respected again!,” he tweeted.

Trump earlier this year nominated Justice Amy Coney Barrett to the high court, shifting it to a conservative majority.

Due to the pandemic, many states lobbied voters to submit absentee ballots, so Americans could maintain safety guidelines.

The FBI, U.S. Attorney General and Department of Justice have repeatedly stated that there is no evidence of voter fraud or election irregularities.

Members of the U.S. Senate on Friday failed to mount a drive to back the Texas suit similar to that of the House GOP.

Sen. Susan Collins, (R-Maine), expressed doubt to reporters on Capitol Hill that the lawsuit would succeed.

“I don’t think it’s likely to prevail given what the Supreme Court did in the Pennsylvania case, but I’m not familiar with the details of the lawsuit,” she said, according to pool reports.

Sen. Josh Hawley, (R-Mo.), told reporters that the Supreme Court could possibly find that the case has no standing.

He added that there’s not an attempt among Senate Republicans to do the same.

“My guess is it’s just nobody here sort of rounded up the troops,” he said. “Usually the way these things work on the amicus brief side… is somebody takes the lead and then says ‘I’ll write it and then I’ll get people to sign on.’ This was a pretty short fuse thing.’”

But some Senate Republicans said that the lawsuit is baseless and that states should not attempt to meddle in the affairs of other states.

“I’m never surprised by the House of Representatives,” Sen. Lamar Alexander of Tennessee said, according to pool reports.

Earlier Friday, he appeared on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” where he questioned the legal argument underlying the Texas suit.

A senior New Jersey Democrat, Rep. Bill Pascrell, chastised House Republicans who supported the Texas suit. Pascrell called for Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), to not swear in the returning and new GOP members who signed the brief into the 117th Congress.

“Simply stated, men and women who would act to tear the United States government apart cannot serve as Members of the Congress,” he said in a statement.

House Republicans who signed on backing the Texas suit include:

ARIZONA

Andy Biggs

Debbie Lesko

COLORADO

Ken Buck

Doug Lamborn

FLORIDA

Gus Bilirakis

Mario Diaz-Balart

Neal Dunn

Drew Ferguson

Matt Gaetz

John Rutherford

Ross Spano

Michael Waltz

Daniel Webster

Ted Yoho

Bill Posey

GEORGIA

Rick Allen

Earl L. “Buddy” Carte

Drew Ferguson

Austin Scott

Doug Collins

Jody Hice

Barry Loudermilk

IOWA

Steve King

KANSAS

Ron Estes

Roger Marshall

LOUISIANA

Ralph Abraham

Clay Higgins

Mike Johnson

Steve Scalise

MARYLAND

Andy Harris

MICHIGAN

Jack Bergman

Bill Huizenga

John Moolenaar

Tim Walberg

MINNESOTA

Tom Emmer

Jim Hagedorn

Pete Stauber

MISSOURI

Sam Graves

Vicky Hartzler

Blaine Leutkemeyer

Jason Smith

Ann Wagner

Billy Long

NORTH CAROLINA

Dan Bishop

Ted Budd

Virginia Foxx

Richard Hudson

Gregory Murphy

David Rouzer

Mark Walker

OHIO

Bob Gibbs

Jim Jordan

Bill Johnson

Robert E. Latta

Brad Wenstrup

PENNSYLVANIA

John Joyce

Fred Keller

Mike Kelly

Dan Meuser

Scott Perry

Guy Reschenthaler

Glenn “GT” Thompson

TENNESSEE

Tim Burchett

Chuck Fleischmann

Mark Green

David Kustoff

John Rose

Scott DeJarlais

VIRGINIA

Ben Cline

Rob Wittman

Morgan Griffith

Carol Miller

Alex Mooney

WISCONSIN

Tom Tiffany

The Louisiana Illuminator is an independent, nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization driven by its mission to cast light on how decisions are made in Baton Rouge and how they affect the lives of everyday Louisianians, particularly those who are poor or otherwise marginalized.