Politics & Government

Lawmakers Scrambling To Pass Mining Tax Deal On Session's Last Day

A parade of strange political bedfellows in support. One lone native tribe in opposition. And a notable lack of questions from lawmakers.

Questions continue to surround education funding, including the role, if any, of additional tax revenue. Signs in front of the legislative building call for a mining tax constitutional amendment.
Questions continue to surround education funding, including the role, if any, of additional tax revenue. Signs in front of the legislative building call for a mining tax constitutional amendment. (Photo: Michael Lyle | Nevada Current)

May 31, 2021

A parade of strange political bedfellows in support. One lone native tribe in opposition. And a notable lack of questions from lawmakers.

Find out what's happening in Across Nevadafor free with the latest updates from Patch.

The optics during the first — and quite likely the only — public hearing on a long-awaited mining tax compromise deal alluded to just how orchestrated efforts have been behind the scenes in the waning days of the legislative session.

Assembly Bill 495 would create a new excise tax on gold and silver mining companies with more than $20 million in gross revenue annually, but attached to it are numerous unrelated provisions clearly meant to entice Republicans into voting with Democrats on the revenue bill. At stake is the fate of five potential ballot questions and millions of dedicated dollars for the state’s beleaguered K-12 education system.

Find out what's happening in Across Nevadafor free with the latest updates from Patch.

AB495 was introduced late Saturday.

On Sunday, the penultimate day of the 120-day session, the bill received a hearing in a joint finance committee and was passed out of its Assembly committee on a party-line vote. It now has less than 24 hours to clear the full Assembly and the Senate before the session ends.

While presenting the bill, Assembly Speaker Jason Frierson (D-Las Vegas) called AB496 “a monumental compromise” that represented a collaboration between Gov. Steve Sisolak, legislative leadership, a teachers union, the gaming and mining industries, progressive advocates and other unnamed “stakeholders.”

Representatives from the Nevada Mining Association and Clark County Education Association presented the bill alongside Frierson. Several progressive groups, as well as several advocates from the ‘school choice’ world also did.

The lone person testifying in opposition was a member of the Shoshone-Piaute Tribe, who criticized lawmakers for not including tribal communities within the conversation.

Behind the scenes, negotiators for the bill were working to secure Republican votes for the bill. Democrats need four Republicans — two in each chamber — to vote with them in order to pass the bill to raise new revenue.


Nevada Current, a nonprofit, online source of political news and commentary, documents the policies, institutions and systems that affect Nevadans’ daily lives. The Current is part of States Newsroom, a national 501(c)(3) nonprofit supported by grants and a coalition of donors and readers.

More from Across Nevada