Politics & Government

Christie Veto Puts Roadblocks Up for Would-Be Surrogates

Joanne Gartner of West Deptford wanted to be a surrogate mother before her husband deploys next year, but a veto from Chris Christie stymied the process.

Twenty-five-year-old substitute teacher Joanne Gartner told reporter Andrew Kitchenman that she and her husband Mark weren't ready for another child yet.

But after the birth of their child, Jackson, 19 months ago, she felt like she could help another family until she was ready to have a second baby.

Find out what's happening in West Deptfordfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

“I’m not ready for another one, but I know that someone else wants a baby and can’t have one, so why can’t I help them?” she said.

But last year, Gov. Chris Christie vetoed a law passed by the New Jersey Assembly that would have allowed parenting rights to transfer to the biological parents in a situation like Gartner's

Find out what's happening in West Deptfordfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

That bill, S-1599, outlines the arrangements in a gestational carrier arrangement—i.e., a mother who carries a baby with whom she has no genetic relationship—and would have made it clear that the parenting rights would transfer from the birth mother immediately after delivery.

Gartner has since found an agency with which to work, but the legal confusion around the law regarding surrogate rights and gestational carrier agreements continues.

Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.