Manhattan Election Results 2024: Live Updates

This story was last updated at 11:13 p.m. on Tuesday.

NEW YORK CITY – Manhattan went to the polls on Tuesday following a reported 1,089,328 early votes citywide, according to unofficial results from New York City's Board of Elections (NYC BOE). More than 500,000 Manhattan residents had checked in to vote as of 6 p.m. on Tuesday.

Polls closed at 9 p.m., although those on line by 9 p.m. will be allowed to vote. For the rest of us, it's time to watch the results roll in.

This was – for the most part – an off-year locally, and it’s not until 2025 that we’ll see competitive contests for Mayor, City Council, Comptroller, Borough President, Public Advocate, and more. Gov. Kathy Hochul isn’t back on the ballot until 2026.

Once all the votes are tallied and certified by the New York City Board of Elections, the official final totals will be announced. All results are unofficial until the Board of Elections certifies them.

This story will be updated as results continue to post.

Results

President/Vice President

• Kamala D. Harris / Tim Walz (Democratic): 67.77% **AP CALL**
• Donald J. Trump / JD Vance (Republican): 30.39%
• Write-In: 1.83%

U.S. Senate

• Kristin E. Gillibrand (Democratic, incumbent): 71.26% **AP CALL**
• Michael Sapraicone (Republican): 27.80%
• Diane Sare (Independent): 0.62%

U.S. House District 10

• Daniel Goldman (Democratic, incumbent): 80.99% **AP CALL**
• Alexander Dodenhoff (Republican): 14.75%
• Paul J. Briscoe (Conservative): 2.64%

U.S. House District 12

• Jerrold L. Nadler (Democratic/Working Families, incumbent): 80.29% **AP CALL**
• Michael K. Zumbluskas (Republican): 19.45%

U.S. House District 13

• Adriano Espaillat (Democratic, incumbent): 83.21% **AP CALL**
• Ruben D. Vargas (Republican/Conservative): 16.18%

State Senate District 27

• Brian Kavanagh (Democratic/Working Families, incumbent, uncontested): 99.08%

State Senate District 28

• Liz Krueger (Democratic, incumbent): 76.10%
• Louis Puliafito (Republican): 23.73%

State Senate District 29

• Jose M. Serrano (Democratic/Working Families, incumbent): 81.66%
• Tanya Carmichael (Republican/Conservative): 18.15%

State Senate District 30

• Cordell Cleare (Democratic/Working Families, incumbent, uncontested): 99.53%

State Senate District 31

• Robert Jackson (Democratic/Working Families, incumbent, uncontested): 99.32%

State Senate District 47

• Brad Hoylman-Sigal (Democratic/Working Families, incumbent): 83.95%
• Emily Yuexin Miller (Republican): 15.85%

State Senate District 59

• Kristen Gonzalez (Democratic/Working Families, incumbent, uncontested): 98.84%

State Assembly District 61

• Charles D. Fall (Democratic, incumbent, uncontested): 97.81%

State Assembly District 65

• Grace Lee (Democratic/Working Families, incumbent, uncontested): 99.10%

State Assembly District 66

• Deborah J. Glick (Democratic, incumbent, uncontested): 98.92%

State Assembly District 67

• Linda B. Rosenthal (Democratic/Working Families, incumbent, uncontested): 98.80%

State Assembly District 68

• Edward Gibbs (Democratic, incumbent, uncontested): 98.79%

State Assembly District 69

• Micah C. Lasher (Democratic): 99.12%

State Assembly District 70

• Jordan J.G. Wright (Democratic): 91.03%
• Seson Adams (Republican): 8.66%

State Assembly District 71

• Al Taylor (Democratic, incumbent): 86.74%
• Joziel Andujar (Republican): 12.87%

State Assembly District 72

• Manny De Los Santos (Democratic/Working Families, incumbent, uncontested): 99.19%

State Assembly District 73

• Alex Bores (Democratic/Working Families, incumbent): 73.55%
• Awadhesh Gupta (Republican): 26.29%

State Assembly District 74

• Harvey D. Epstein (Democratic/Working Families, incumbent, uncontested): 98.95%

State Assembly District 75

• Tony Simone (Democratic/Working Families, incumbent, uncontested): 99.09%

State Assembly District 76

• Rebecca A. Seawright (Democratic/Working Families, incumbent, uncontested): 98.89%

Justice of the Supreme Court 1st Judicial District (two to be elected)

• Cynthia Sharon Kern (Democratic): 54.50%
• Gerald Lebovits (Democratic): 44.55%

Judge Of The Civil Court (six to be elected)

• Louis L. Nock (Democratic): 16.33%
• Malaika Scott-McLaughlin (Democratic): 17.15%
• Allison R. Greenfield (Democratic): 17.32%
• Harold E. Bahr (Democratic): 15.98%
• Elizabeth Y. Shamahs (Democratic): 16.32%
• Crystal Villasenor (Democratic): 16.22%

Judge Of The Civil Court 1st Municipal Court District

• Ilona B. Coleman (Democratic): 99.06%

Judge Of The Civil Court 2nd Municipal Court District

• Alice Tam Tien (Democratic): 99.28%

Judge Of The Civil Court 5th Municipal Court District

• Ralph L. Wolf (Democratic): 99.24%

Judge Of The Civil Court 8th Municipal Court District

• Jose A. Padilla Jr. (Democratic): 99.43%

Judge Of The Civil Court 10th Municipal Court District

• J. Machelle Sweeting (Democratic): 99.60%

Ballot Proposals

Proposal Number 1, an Amendment: Amendment to Protect Against Unequal Treatment

This proposal would protect against unequal treatment based on ethnicity, national origin, age, disability, and sex, including sexual orientation, gender identity and pregnancy. It also protects against unequal treatment based on reproductive healthcare and autonomy. A "YES" vote puts these protections in the New York State Constitution. A "NO" vote leaves these protections out of the State Constitution.

Yes: 77.67%
No: 22.33%

Proposal Number 2, a Question: Cleaning Public Property

This proposal would amend the City Charter to expand and clarify the Department of Sanitation’s power to clean streets and other City property and require disposal of waste in containers. Voting “Yes” will expand and clarify the Department of Sanitation’s power to clean streets and other City property and require disposal of waste in containers. Voting “No” leaves laws unchanged.

Yes: 61.69%
No: 38.31%

Proposal Number 3, a Question: Additional Estimates of the Cost of Proposed Laws and Updates to Budget Deadlines

This proposal would amend the City Charter to require fiscal analysis from the Council before hearings and votes on laws, authorize fiscal analysis from the Mayor, and update budget deadlines. Voting “Yes” would amend the City Charter to require additional fiscal analysis
prior to hearings and votes on local laws , and update budget deadlines. Voting “No” leaves laws unchanged.

Yes: 55.63%
No: 44.37%

Proposal Number 4, a Question: More Notice and Time Before Votes on Public Safety Legislation

This proposal would require additional public notice and time before the City Council votes on laws respecting the public safety operations of the Police, Correction, or Fire Departments. Voting “Yes” will require additional notice and time before the Council votes on laws respecting public safety operations of the Police, Correction, or Fire Departments. Voting “No” leaves laws unchanged.

Yes: 56.98%
No: 43.02%

Proposal Number 5, a Question: Capital Planning

This proposal would amend the City Charter to require more detail in the annual assessment of City facilities, mandate that facility needs inform capital planning, and update capital planning deadlines. Voting “Yes” would require more detail when assessing maintenance needs of City facilities, mandate that facility needs inform capital planning, and update capital planning deadlines. Voting “No” leaves laws unchanged.

Yes: 57.70%
No: 42.30%

Proposal Number 6, a Question: Minority and Women-Owned Business Enterprises (MWBEs), Film Permits, and Archive Review Boards

This proposal would amend the City Charter to establish the Chief Business Diversity Officer (CBDO), authorize the Mayor to designate the office that issues film permits, and combine archive boards. Voting “Yes” would establish the CBDO to support MWBEs, authorize the Mayor to designate the office that issues film permits, and combine two boards. Voting “No” leaves laws unchanged.

Yes: 47.27%
No: 52.73%

And that's a wrap! Next up, 2025. It never ends.