Politics & Government

New NYC Jails Approved In Major Step Toward Closing Rikers Island

The historic vote to replace the notorious complex with four new jails followed racuous protests inside and outside City Hall.

No New Jails activists squared off with police outside City Hall Thursday before a City Council vote on plans for four new jails.
No New Jails activists squared off with police outside City Hall Thursday before a City Council vote on plans for four new jails. (Photo from No New Jails NYC)

NEW YORK — The City Council approved plans Thursday to replace Rikers Island with four new jails in a historic step toward closing the notorious complex.

Mayor Bill de Blasio's proposal for a new lockup in each borough but Staten Island overcame sustained criticism from both law-enforcement hawks and leftist prison-abolitionists to clear the council 36-13.

The vote followed raucous protests outside City Hall and inside the council chambers, where onlookers were ejected from the balcony after protesters shouted and threw flyers onto the floor.

Find out what's happening in New York Cityfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

While the $8.7 billion plan's supporters acknowledged the long road ahead, they said it was long past time to shutter a place that has tortured and killed countless New Yorkers over the course of its long, dark history.

"We are closing a penal colony in the East River which symbolizes inhumanity and brutality," council Speaker Johnson, a Chelsea Democrat, said before the vote as he appeared to pound his fist on a podium. "We cannot solve all the world’s problems in today’s vote. That is not possible. I wish we could. But we are doing something very, very significant here today."

Find out what's happening in New York Cityfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

The de Blasio administration plans to build the jails, ranging in height from 195 to 295 feet, by 2026 in Lower Manhattan, Downtown Brooklyn, Kew Gardens and Mott Haven. The facilities will have modern designs and give incarcerated people better access to their families, social services and the courts, from all of which they are isolated on Rikers, officials say.

Council Member Rafael Salamanca, a Bronx Democrat, voted against two land-use measures related to the plans including one specific to his borough. Those applications passed 35-14.

The project's approval came hours after city officials detailed a $391 million funding commitment for programs meant to reduce mass incarceration. The money — $125.7 million of which was already budgeted — will support alternatives to jail, services for people behind bars, housing and community programs, officials said.

That figure represents about 4.5 percent of the cost of building the new jails. Most of the money will be baselined spending implemented over roughly the next three years, ending in the 2023 fiscal year, council officials said.

"When we pledged to close Rikers Island, we made a promise to transform a broken criminal justice system and give back to the communities that have experienced the effects of mass incarceration firsthand," de Blasio, a Democrat, said in a statement. "By investing in neighborhoods and putting people on the path to success, we are making good and getting closer to a day where we’re the fairest, big city in America."

That deal came after marathon meetings between de Blasio's office and the council over what investments would accompany the new jails, Johnson said.

Amid the negotiations, Democratic Council Member Stephen Levin — whose district includes the Brooklyn jail site — held up Wednesday's committee vote on the jails for 90 minutes until he got $10 million more for restorative justice measures, lawmakers said.

The council also approved a resolution that lawmakers say will ultimately ban jails from operating on Rikers after the end of 2026, the city's target date for shuttering the island's facilities.

Both the city's projected jail population and the proposed sizes of the jails have shrunk significantly since the de Blasio administration first unveiled the plans in August 2018.

The city now expects to have 3,795 jail beds to hold an estimated 3,300 detainees and inmates, down from about 6,000 beds to hold roughly 5,000 people.

But neither those reductions nor the new pile of money sweetened the deal enough for several lawmakers who argued that closing Rikers will not repair the broken criminal-justice system of which it is a part.

To Brooklyn Council Member Carlos Menchaca, the plan left Rikers's true future in question without doing enough to attack the "root causes" of mass incarceration.

"I believe this vote only enriches developers in the short term while leaving the fate of Rikers in the hands of a future mayor and a future council," Menchaca, a Democrat, said before voting no. "Yet the mayor asks us to trust him. I do not trust this mayor."

Menchaca's position echoed that of No New Jails NYC, a diffuse coalition of prison-abolition activists that argues the city does not need build more cages to close Rikers.

The coalition said two people were arrested as its members protested the plan outside City Hall Thursday morning. A crowd of protesters also confronted de Blasio on the building's front steps while shouting, "No new jails! Close Rikers now!"

No New Jails members have cast doubt on the city's commitment to closing its existing jails as it plans to spend billions of dollars on new ones rather than housing, health care and other critical services. They have also accused city officials of rushing the plans through the public land-use process with little regard for community concerns.

"At every step of the way they’re misleading people, and they know that," Brooklyn No New Jails activist Ben Ndugga-Kabuye said in a Wednesday interview.

Meanwhile, moderate council members worry the city's emphasis on alternatives to jail will put dangerous criminals back on the street.

Some lawmakers have called for renovating the existing facilities on Rikers instead of building high-rise jails in dense neighborhoods.

"The plan does not take into consideration the risks that these jails will present in the event of an emergency, nor does it consider the possibility of future spikes in crime, which I have seen in decades past," Queens Council Member Robert Holden said in a statement.

Supportive lawmakers said some of the critics' concerns are valid; Levin went so far as to thank the No New Jails movement for pushing the council to do better.

But the critiques ultimately did not shake the leading supporters from their positions.

"This is the hardest vote I have taken in my entire career. But you know what? I go to sleep at night, and I sleep very well," said Council Member Karen Koslowitz, a Democrat representing the Queens jail site. "The people that say no have no solutions. They just say no."

Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.