Crime & Safety

Starbucks Ordered To Pay $50 Million To Customer Burned By Hot Drink

A man who alleged his private parts were disfigured by a Starbucks coffee that spilled on him at a drive-thru was awarded $50M by a jury.

 The accident occurred Feb. 8, 2020, because the lid on one of the three hot drinks he bought was not properly fastened and the cup was not fully placed into the drink carrier, according to the suit brought by Postmates driver Michael Garcia.
The accident occurred Feb. 8, 2020, because the lid on one of the three hot drinks he bought was not properly fastened and the cup was not fully placed into the drink carrier, according to the suit brought by Postmates driver Michael Garcia. (Peggy Bayard/Patch)

LOS ANGELES, CA — A jury has awarded $50 million to a man who alleged his private parts were disfigured by a Starbucks Corp. hot drink that spilled onto him when he was handed the beverage at a drive-thru window in Jefferson Park in 2020.

The Los Angeles Superior Court panel reached its verdict Friday morning in the lawsuit filed by Postmates driver Michael Garcia. The accident occurred Feb. 8, 2020, because the lid on one of the three hot drinks he bought was not properly fastened and the cup was not fully placed into the drink carrier, according to the suit brought by Garcia a month later.

Garcia suffered severe burns, disfigurement and debilitating nerve damage to his genitals, the suit stated.

Find out what's happening in Los Angelesfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

The trial was split into two phases. The jury found Starbucks negligent on March 6 and then reached its decision on damages Friday. The trial included internal video footage of the exchange leading to Garcia's injuries.

In their court papers, Starbucks attorneys denied liability and disputed the amount of damages claimed by Garcia. The coffee chain released a statement regarding the verdict.

Find out what's happening in Los Angelesfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

"We sympathize with Mr. Garcia, but we disagree with the jury's decision that we were at fault for this incident and believe the damages awarded to be excessive," the statement read. "We plan to appeal. We have always been committed to the highest safety standards in our stores, including the handling of hot drinks."