Sonoma County Airport Mask Rules: Latest Policies For Travelers

SANTA ROSA, CA — A federal judge struck down the federal travel mask mandate Monday, meaning face coverings to protect against COVID-19 are no longer required on planes, trains and, in most cases, subways and buses.

At Charles M. Schulz - Sonoma County Airport, mask use is recommended but will not be enforced.

"In accordance with @TSA not enforcing the federal mask mandate, at this time mask use is recommended but will not be enforced," Sonoma County Airport said Tuesday in a statement posted to Twitter. "TSA is still evaluating how they will respond to the ruling, and there may be additional changes in the future."

On Monday, Florida federal Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle said in the 59-page decision striking down the travel mask mandate that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention both exceeded its legal authority and failed to go through proper channels to put the rule in place.

As a result, the CDC said its order requiring masks on public transportation "is no longer in effect" and the agency will not enforce it. However, the CDC said it "continues to recommend that people wear masks in indoor public transportation settings at this time."

The CDC first issued an order mandating masks on public conveyances in January 2021, saying "traveling on public transportation increases a person's risk of getting and spreading COVID-19."

Effective Tuesday, the Transportation Security Administration was no longer requiring masks on planes or in the nation's airports. One by one, most of the nation's major airlines dropped mask requirements, making the face coverings optional for employees and passengers.

Overnight, the scene at Golden State airports and others across the country changed dramatically.
Here are the mask regulations for California's largest airports as of Tuesday:

• LAX - Masks not required.
• SFO - Masks not required.
• San Diego Airport - Masks not required.
• Sacramento International Airport - Masks not required.
• John Wayne Airport - Mask requirement extended through May 3.
• Oakland Int'l Airport -Masks not required.
• Hollywood-Burbank Airport - Masks not required.

The TSA said in its statement that the CDC continues to recommend face coverings to protect against the coronavirus. Amtrak issued a stronger statement, saying that although they are no longer required of passengers and employees, "masks are welcome and remain an important preventive measure against COVID-19."

The Florida decision also affects ride-hailing companies. Uber no longer requires masks as of Tuesday and Lyft soon followed suit, saying masks are now optional for riders and drivers.

Still, some state and local transit agencies could keep their mask requirements. Last week, the CDC had extended the now-suspended mask rule to study the worrisome BA.2. subvariant of the coronavirus, which is responsible for most of the COVID-19 cases around the country.

In the Bay Area, San Francisco's Muni system said a mask order remains in effect until further notice from the Federal Transit Administration.

Caltrain announced its mask policy has not changed.

"Please wear a mask onboard to reduce airborne saliva particulate," Caltrain said via Twitter. "Our team will review the latest developments out of Florida. Updates to come."

The Metropolitan Transportation Authority in New York City said Monday it would keep its mask mandate in place on the bus, subway and rail systems it oversees, The New York Times reported.

The case before Mizelle, appointed to the federal bench by now-former President Donald Trump in November 2020 after he lost the presidential election, was filed in July 2021 by two plaintiffs and the Health Freedom Defense Fund.

"The court concludes that the mask mandate exceeds the CDC's statutory authority and violates the procedures required for agency rulemaking under the APA," the judge wrote.

It's unclear if the Biden administration will appeal the decision. White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki told reporters Monday that Mizelle's decision was "disappointing," and the administration's response is still under review and the "Department of Justice would make any determination about litigation."