Crime & Safety

Santa Monica Home Invasion Rapist To Get Sentence Reduced

A state appeals court panel ordered a new sentencing hearing for a man who was convicted of forcible rape in Santa Monica in 2018.

SANTA MONICA, CA — A state appeals court panel has upheld a man's conviction on forcible rape, burglary and other counts for an early morning attack in 2018 on a Santa Monica woman who was sleeping, but ordered a new sentencing hearing for him.

In a 30-page ruling released Wednesday, a three-justice panel rejected the defense's contention that there were errors in the trial of Dylan James Jensen.

The appellate court panel noted that Jensen "did not dispute that he sexually assaulted" the victim, instead pursuing an insanity defense in which he claimed that he was delusional when he committed the attack and believed the victim was his wife.

Find out what's happening in Santa Monicafor free with the latest updates from Patch.

Jurors convicted Jensen of forcible rape, forcible sodomy, forcible oral copulation, first-degree burglary and sexual battery in connection with the June 4, 2018, attack on a woman in her apartment in the 2900 block of Fourth Street. The jury found that he was sane at the time of the crimes.

Jensen broke into the apartment through a balcony door, took a knife from the kitchen, woke the sleeping woman and sexually assaulted her in an attack that lasted about 45 minutes, according to the appellate court panel's ruling.

Find out what's happening in Santa Monicafor free with the latest updates from Patch.

The victim called 911 shortly after the defendant left, and he was located and detained within minutes of the attack, the justices noted.

Jensen, now 46, was sentenced in April 2022 to 100 years to life in state prison.

The appellate court panel agreed with some of Jensen's challenges to his sentence, ordering a Los Angeles County Superior Court judge to reduce his sentences for forcible sodomy and forcible oral copulation and to either impose concurrent sentences on four of the charges or to "clarify the legal and factual basis for its discretionary determination to impose consecutive sentences on those counts."

The justices, however, rejected the defense's claim that the trial court abused its discretion by denying a motion by the prosecution to dismiss allegations of use of a deadly weapon under a directive issued by then-newly elected District Attorney George Gascón.

Copyright 2024, City News Service, Inc.