Schools

D86's 'Winning Hand' in Barrett Case Was Costing Taxpayers, Corcoran Says

Ed Corcoran and Claudia Manley told Patch why they voted in favor of a settlement with former board member Dianne Barrett.

District 86 board members who supported settling the Dianne Barrett lawsuit Monday night said district spending was a major motivation.

Ed Corcoran, who voted along with Claudia Manley and Richard Skoda to approve the settlement of a three-year court battle between District 86 and the former board member, wasn’t swayed by the fact that two DuPage County judges had dismissed Barrett’s complaints. 

"I personally support the settlement process because our ‘winning hand’ was costing taxpayers a small fortune with no upside to students or taxpayers," Corcoran said in an emailed statement.

Find out what's happening in Darienfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

Manley, the board president, echoed Corcoran.

"The new board was able to look at the possibilities with a fresh set of eyes. When those eyes saw the legal fees incurred to date totaling approximately $120,000, the eyes widened," Manley said in her own email. "The knowledge of an appeal pending was a sure fire way to incur even more fees."

Find out what's happening in Darienfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

Manley continued, "None, let me repeat none, of the fees are covered by insurance. Thus, every cent is out of the district's own coffers. This settlement allows the board and the district to place this complicated matter behind it and focus on other district priorities."

READ: Gallo on Barrett Settlement: ‘I Just Don’t Understand This At All’

Both Manley and Corcoran dismissed the idea that the decision to settle with Barrett was a politically motivated. Barrett supported the Friends for District 86 slate of Victor Casini, Corcoran and Manley last spring in a letter published by The Doings on March 21, and was an ally of Skoda’s on the previous board.

"There was no political motivation, no axe to grind and no favors done, except for the taxpayer," Corcoran said. "The motivation comes from wanting to make a good business decision and continue protection of student records and board rights."

The board member continued, "This case could have been settled at any time but the previous board was motivated otherwise. The current board has no axe to grind and wants to eliminate distractions and controversy."

Regarding Skoda, who attended several court hearings on the Barrett case, Corcoran said the former teacher has done an "admirable job" in the past advocating for both students and taxpayers.

"We should all thank Dr. Skoda for his efforts," Corcoran said. "A few years from now we will all ask ourselves why this case was not settled amicably two or three years earlier, and then pause and thank Dr. Skoda."

Patch was unsuccessful in attempts to reach Skoda by phone and email.

In addition to halting spending on the case, Corcoran said the district will benefit from the settlement’s replacing of Board Policy 2:225, which demanded that board members seeking records not publicly available justify their request, and its mandate that documents such as the special-education documents sought by Barrett in the lawsuit will not be denied board members in the future.

If future board member requests for information are considered abusive, a district release sent out after Monday's vote states, they will be reviewed by the board but would require a 2/3 vote to be denied. If denied, the requesting board member can appeal to the circuit court for an informal proceeding.

"The student record protection is and will always be a responsibility and mandate of the board," Corcoran said. "Clear reinstatement of several board rights we are entitled to as fiduciaries was also accomplished in this settlement."

Jennifer Planson, one of the two board members who voted against the settlement, said new policy under the settlement would allow board members unrestricted access to district buildings. Manley said she could not confirm or deny that "until a few legal i's are dotted and t's are crossed."

Patch submitted a FOIA request for a copy of the Barrett settlement Tuesday morning, but had not yet received it as of noon Friday.

There are plenty of ways to keep up on Hinsdale-Clarendon Hills news:

Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.