Politics & Government
City Of Manchester Faces Lawsuit Brought By ACLU of NH
The city is facing legal action with police accused of taking a man's cell phone in 2019, violating his fourth and first amendment rights.

MANCHESTER, NH — The ACLU-NH filed a federal civil rights lawsuit against the Manchester Police Department and three of its officers for forcibly seizing a man’s smartphone without a warrant after he was recording the department’s officers engaging multiple individuals during a fight at the 7-Eleven convenience store at 85 South Main Street in Manchester.
The incident occurred on Oct. 17, 2019, and the man was a bystander. After seizing the phone, the department then, without explanation, kept the phone without obtaining a warrant for over two weeks.
The plaintiff in the case is Neil Pineda-Landaverde. As alleged in the lawsuit, the department’s actions violated Mr. Pineda-Landaverde’s Fourth and First Amendment rights.
Find out what's happening in Bedfordfor free with the latest updates from Patch.
"The Fourth Amendment is clear that the police can only take someone’s property if they have a warrant or consent," the ACLU said in a statement. "One exception to the warrant requirement is where there is an exigent circumstance. In addition, under the First Amendment, a member of the public has the right to video and/or audio record law enforcement officers in a public place when the officers are acting in the course of their official duties, provided that the recording does not interfere with the officer’s performance of those duties."
As explained in the lawsuit, simply being a bystander and recording the police interacting with a suspect does not constitute an exigency that excuses the police from getting a warrant to obtain the recording.
Find out what's happening in Bedfordfor free with the latest updates from Patch.
As at least one federal court has concluded, the department’s position that it can confiscate bystanders’ cell phones without a warrant would, taken to its logical conclusion, permit the police to seize cell phones from any person, in any place, at any time, so long as the phone contains photographs or videos that could serve as evidence of a crime — simply because the nature of the device used to capture that evidence might result in it being lost.
Read the complete court document here.