House Budget Bill Could Slash Medicaid: See How HV Reps Voted

HUDSON VALLEY, NY — The Hudson Valley delegation in the U.S. House split down party lines on a GOP budget blueprint Tuesday evening that calls for deep spending cuts, potentially including $880 billion to Medicaid, which nearly 7 million New York residents rely on for health coverage.

The resolution was a crucial step toward delivering President Donald Trump’s "big, beautiful bill" with $4.5 trillion in tax breaks and $2 trillion in spending cuts. It narrowly passed, 217-215, overcoming a wall of opposition from Democrats and discomfort among Republicans. All Democrats and a single Republican — Congressman Tom Massie of Kentucky — voted against it.

The potentially largest cut to Medicaid in U.S. history could be a sticking point for some moderate Republicans in the long, cumbersome process ahead to pass the budget. That includes weeks of committee hearings to draft the details and send the House version to the Senate, where Republicans passed their own scaled-back version.

Medicaid is the primary comprehensive health and long-term care program used by 1 in 5 Americans, and accounts for nearly $1 out of every $5 spent on health care, according to KFF (Kaiser Family Foundation), an independent provider of health policy research, polling and news.

Here’s how the Hudson Valley House delegation voted:

George Latimer, (D-Rye), 16th District voted nay.

"Like many House Democrats, I am extremely concerned about the House Republican budget plan that just passed the House, and how it would affect families in my district. The cuts needed for these tax breaks will mean over 196,000 residents in my district are at risk of losing Medicaid coverage. This includes 73,000 children and 27,000 seniors. This budget plan also threatens 74,000 people who count on SNAP to put food on the table. Republicans have promised to lower costs, but this budget won’t do that at all. Instead, it will make life harder and more expensive for my constituents and Americans across the country. As the budget process moves forward in the House, Democrats are going to fight for fairness and opportunity for every American."

Michael Lawler, (R-Pearl River), 17th District voted yea.

Rep. Mike Lawler (R-New York) said Trump has promised he would not allow Medicaid to be cut.

"The president was clear about that. I was clear about that," Lawler said. "We will work through this, but the objective today is to begin the process."

Patrick Ryan, (D-Gardiner), 18th District voted nay.

"Every single day, I am fighting to make the Hudson Valley more affordable, more safe, and more free – this budget proposal does the exact opposite. The wealthiest 0.1% of Americans would each get a tax cut of over $300,000 and Trump wants to pay for it by gutting health care and food assistance for over 150,000 Hudson Valley residents. It’s not just the immediate harm of gutting healthcare access, but also the long-term impact of adding more than $4 trillion to the national debt. I’m doing everything I can to block these harmful cuts, protect our community, and make sure tax cuts go to the middle-class, not the ultra-wealthy."

Even as they press ahead, Republicans are running into a familiar problem: Slashing federal spending is typically easier said than done. With cuts to the Pentagon and other programs largely off limits, much of the other government outlays go for health care, food stamps, student loans and programs relied on by their constituents.

Several Republican lawmakers worry that the scope of the cuts being eyed — particularly some $880 billion over a decade to the committee that handles health care spending, including Medicaid, for example, or $230 billion to the agriculture committee that funds food stamps — will be too harmful to their constituents back home.

GOP leaders insist Medicaid is not specifically listed in the initial 60-page budget framework, which is true; the proposal directs the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which oversees Medicaid, to cut $880 billion in spending over the next decade. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) and his leadership team also told lawmakers they would have plenty of time to debate the details as they shape the final package.

Medicaid is a valued safety net program, according to a recent KFF poll that showed 77 percent of Americans and 84 percent of Medicaid recipients view it favorably. Nearly half (46 percent) and two-thirds of Medicaid enrollees believe the federal government isn’t spending enough on the program, according to the poll.

According to data from KFF, Medicaid and CHIP (Children’s Health Insurance Program), of Medicaid recipients nationwide:

• 82 percent are children living below the poverty level;
• 62 percent are people living in nursing homes;
• 41 percent are pregnant women giving birth;
• 39 percent are children;
• 31 percent are non-elderly adults with disabilities;
• 19 percent are Medicare recipients.

More big votes are ahead, including an unrelated deal to prevent a government shutdown when federal funding expires March 14. Those talks are also underway.

It’s all unfolding amid emerging backlash to what’s happening elsewhere as billionaire Trump adviser Elon Musk is tearing through federal agencies with his Department of Government Efficiency firing thousands of workers nationwide, and angry voters are starting to confront lawmakers at town hall meetings back home.

During debate Tuesday, Democrats decried the package as a "betrayal" to Americans, a "blueprint for American decline" and simply a "Republican rip-off."

"Our very way of life as a country is under assault," House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries said Tuesday. But as the minority party, they don’t have the votes to stop it.

Although the blueprint ultimately passed, some Republicans said they want assurance that Medicaid will be protected as the House version takes shape and is merged with the Senate proposal.

"While we fully support efforts to rein in wasteful spending and deliver on President Trump’s agenda, it is imperative that we do not slash programs that support American communities across our nation," Rep. Tony Gonzales (R-Texas) wrote in a letter signed by several other GOP lawmakers from the Hispanic Conference. Another member of the Hispanic Caucus, Rep. Juan Ciscomani (R-Arizona), also raised concerns about protecting Medicaid, food stamps and Pell grants for college.

Some GOP deficit hawks withheld support until they were convinced the $4.5 trillion in tax cuts for wealthy Americans wouldn’t add to the nation's $36 trillion debt load. Massie, the lone Republican voting against the blueprint, wrote on X that it "extends the 5 yr. tax holiday we've been enjoying, but because it doesn’t cut spending much, it increases the deficit by over $300 billion/yr. compared to letting tax cuts expire. Over 10 years, this budget will add $20 trillion to US debt."

The Associated Press contributed reporting.