Community Corner
New Tort Law 1st Step In Getting Justice For Sexual Assault Survivors, Victim Says
There is no amount of money that can keep Jessica Simpkins from replaying the images of her rape at the hands of a church pastor.
By
Susan Tebben
-
There is no amount of money that can keep Jessica Simpkins from replaying the images of her rape at the hands of a church pastor.
Find out what's happening in Across Ohiofor free with the latest updates from Patch.
But having a law in place that protects her and other victims of sexual violence would help, she said on Tuesday.
“They need to look at the victim, look at the story, and…victims need to be protected instead of the predators,” Simpkins said during a discussion led by progressive nonprofit ProgressOhio.
Find out what's happening in Across Ohiofor free with the latest updates from Patch.
Simpkins was the subject of an Ohio Supreme Court case which ultimately decided putting a limit on civil damages that could be given to victims in cases such as hers was constitutional.
Simpkins’ assailant, Brian Williams, formerly a senior pastor at Sunbury Grace Brethren Church, was convicted of two counts of sexual battery and sentenced to two four-year prison terms, according to court documents.
But when it came to a civil lawsuit asking for $3.6 million in damages for Simpkins, an appeals court and the Ohio Supreme Court agreed that it should be reduced to $500,000 as part of legislation regarding tort reform.
Tort is the legal term for an infringement on rights that can lead to a civil lawsuit, usually to obtain monetary relief.
The Ohio Supreme Court, led in the majority opinion by Justice Judith L. French, cited the Ohio legislature’s 2005 tort reform law, which justified limits on “noneconomic loss” — things like “pain and suffering” or “mental anguish” — by saying they are “inherently subjective and easily tainted by irrelevant considerations.”
In the 2016 court decision, French wrote that despite a psychologist’s testimony that Simpkins suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder and depression due to the sexual assault, the fact that she “played basketball in high school and college, got good grades in college, is currently employed full-time, has not sought or participated in mental health treatment or counseling since 2008 (the time of the assault), and does not have current plans to seek treatment,” the noneconomic injuries did not meet the qualifications required to lift caps on the damage awards.
“Since I could play basketball and go to school and have friends, Justice Kennedy assumed it didn’t affect my life because I could fulfill a normal life,” Simpkins said on Tuesday.
In writing against the decision of the majority of supreme court justices, Justice Paul Pfeifer called for another look at the tort legislation put into law in 2005.
“It is past time for the general assembly (and this court) to reconsider ‘tort reform’ and return the authority to determine damages to juries, where it rightfully and constitutionally belongs,” Pfeifer wrote.
With that in mind, state Rep. Kristin Boggs, D-Columbus, said she plans to bring back legislation that has been introduced in two different cycles of the General Assembly.
“The General Assembly had a duty to make clear that these caps on damages should not be applied to survivors of sexual violence,” Boggs said during the Tuesday call.
In House Bill 515, Boggs said the tort law would not change as it relates to unintentional claims or claims of negligence, but would exclusively change to benefit survivors of sexual violence. With a majority Republican House, Boggs said she is seeing an “extraordinary amount of pushback for this legislation.”
“If I’m being candid, I don’t have a lot of hope that this General Assembly, the people who are leading this General Assembly, are prioritizing this issue and considering it from a survivors’ point of view,” Boggs said. “I don’t see this being presented for a floor vote for a very, very long time.”
State Rep. Bill Seitz, who was a part of the tort reform in 2005, spoke up against a similar bill that Boggs introduced in the previous General Assembly, saying the cap wouldn’t apply to perpetrators, and that removing the cap wholesale would allow more and more reasons to lift the cap.
That bill never moved past the first hearing in February of 2017.
This story was originally published by the Ohio Capital Journal. For more stories from the Ohio Capital Journal, visit OhioCapitalJournal.com.