PA Director Warns Of 'Racial Intimidation' In Neshaminy Name Case

LANGHORNE, PA — A week after a state commission ruled that Neshaminy High School may continue to use the nickname "Redskins," with some limitations, that commission's director promised to work with residents, while also warning against "racial hatred" he said has been directed at a key player in the case.

In a statement released Monday, Chad Dion Lassiter, executive director of the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission, said former Neshaminy parent Donna Boyle has been targeted with "racial hatred and intimidation" since filing a complaint against the nickname, which many people feel is racist.

"I am aware of the racial hatred and intimidation that has been directed towards Donna Boyle and her colleagues (and) would advise those who engage in this behavior to stop immediately as the PHRC will not allow these behaviors to go unchecked," Lassiter said.

On Nov. 25, the commission ruled in a 7-1 vote that the district may continue using the nickname "Redskins," but must stop using logos and imagery that "negatively stereotype Native Americans."

The nickname has been used at Neshaminy High for more than 60 years. It has been a source of controversy for years, particularly since Boyle, in 2013, filed a complaint that led to the PHRC getting involved.

In Monday's statement, Lassiter continued to decry the nickname as racist.

"I feel strongly that 'Redskins' is a racially demeaning term and should not be used anywhere, let alone in a school ...," he said. "PHRC will enforce the order because it is our duty. However, I know the use of that word is as wrong and harmful as the use of the 'n-word.' "

Lassiter said the commission plans to visit Neshaminy "and work to heal the community." The commission plans a social justice lecture series, town hall meeting and "talk back" sessions in Bucks County in the coming months, he said.

He also defended the commission's process in the statement. Some critics called it unfair that the complaint against Neshaminy was both brought by and ruled upon by the commission.

Lassiter noted that the PHRC has three branches. As director, Lassiter filed the complaint. The commission's staff then worked to seek a settlement, determine probable cause and hold a public hearing.

A permanent hearing officer acted as judge in the case and the commission acted as the jury.

"To avoid collusion, there is separation and the (hearing officer) may not discuss the case nor their decision with any of the lawyers, the executive director, or the commissioners until it is presented to the commissioners for review, revision, and response," Lassiter said.

The officer's recommendation is ultimately presented to, then voted upon, by commissioners during a public meeting.