District 5 Receives Top Grade Under New Federal Accountability System

Lexington-Richland 5 and 12 of its schools received an "A" under the new federal accountability system.

District 5 received an overall grade of A¹ (point total or composite score was 92.2), which means the district substantially exceed the state's expectations. 

The state also received an A (90).

Twelve schools received an overall grade of A (point total): Ballentine Elementary (100), Chapin Elementary (97.4), Lake Murray Elementary (99.2), Leaphart Elementary (97.4), Oak Pointe Elementary (98), River Springs Elementary (96.9), Chapin Middle (95.9), CrossRoads Middle (94.2), Dutch Fork Middle (90.2), Irmo Middle (92.2), Chapin High (92), Dutch Fork High (92.9)

Six schools received an overall grade of B (point total): Dutch Fork Elementary (87.3), H. E. Corley Elementary (86.2), Harbison West Elementary (87.1), Nursery Road Elementary (87.2), Seven Oaks Elementary (88.4), Irmo High (87.7)

One school received an overall grade of C (point total): Irmo Elementary School (77.1).

Under the old system, the South Carolina Department of Education would report Adequately Yearly Progress (AYP) results for the districts and schools as "Met" or "Not Met." 

Now with this new federal accountability system, schools receive a letter grade of A, B, C, D or F.

To see the department's flexibility waiver request click here.

The waiver request called for an improvement to the state's accountability system. One of the changes included reporting letter grades. 

The plan also includes a new educator evaluation system and increasing transparency of student achievement by student subgroups.

Letter grades are awarded to schools and districts based on student achievement in several areas including English-language Arts, math and high school graduation rates.

The old system of AYP frustrated many in the educational community. Even if a school met all but one objective, the school would still be labeled as "Not Met" (not meeting the standards).

For example, in 2011 Ballentine Elementary met 17 out of 17 objectives and was considered to have met AYP.

At Dutch Fork Middle, the school met 20 out of 21 objectives and was labeled as a school not meeting AYP. 

According to the state department, one of the goals in developing an alternative to AYP was that the new system would not be an "all or nothing" system.

State education officials say the new system will give schools and districts "a much more realistic accountability system..."

The criteria for the grading system for high schools will still be different from elementary and middle schools. 

2012-2013 Title I Reward Schools-SC's ESEA/Federal Accountability System

The ESEA waiver also brings a new recognition program for Title I schools, which are schools that have a high number of low-income students, and receive extra federal money to help meet the needs of at-risk and low-income students.

According to the state education office, the ESEA waiver requires the department recognizes high-performing schools and low-performing schools.

Title I schools are listed as the following:

• Priority Schools: The lowest performing Title I schools.
• Focus Schools: Title I schools with the highest average performance gap between subgroups. 
• Reward Schools for Performance: The highest performing Title I schools in a given year.
• Reward Schools for Progress: Title I schools that demonstrate the most substantial progress in either the “all students” group or in identified subgroups from one school year to the next.

For District 5, H. E. Corley, Harbison West  and Nursery Road elementary schools were listed as Focus Schools. 

Leaphart and Seven Oaks elementary schools were listed as Reward Schools for Performance. 

For more information about the Federal Accountability System data, visit the South Carolina Department of Education website.