Schools

Nearly $200K In Unpaid Hinsdale D86 Legal Bills

The board rejected its former firm's August bill and hasn't even voted on September's.

Joseph Perkoski, an attorney with Robbins Schwartz, enters Hinsdale South High School in June, just in time for a closed school board session. He was the main lawyer representing District 86.
Joseph Perkoski, an attorney with Robbins Schwartz, enters Hinsdale South High School in June, just in time for a closed school board session. He was the main lawyer representing District 86. (David Giuliani/Patch)

HINSDALE, IL – Hinsdale High School District 86's unpaid legal bills from its former law firm have grown to nearly $200,000.

This is the result of the district's ongoing dispute with the Chicago-based Robbins Schwartz firm.

In October, the board voted unanimously against paying the firm's $131,770 August bill.

Find out what's happening in Hinsdale-Clarendon Hillsfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

At the board's Nov. 21 meeting, members approved an $11,727 bill from another firm, Oak Brook-based Engler, Callaway, Baasten & Sraga.

But it turns out Robbins Schwartz's $62,715 September bill wasn't even placed on the Nov. 21 agenda. That brings the total of unpaid bills to $194,485. (The latest bill was made available through a resident's public records request.)

Find out what's happening in Hinsdale-Clarendon Hillsfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

A message left with Superintendent Michael Lach and the district's spokesman early Friday morning went unreturned.

In the newest bill, the biggest item was $12,095, which was for a personnel investigation.

In early September, Robbins Schwartz terminated its relationship with the district, saying the district was "unreasonably difficult" to serve. That was a few days after the school board hired Engler for some of its legal business.

Robbins Schwartz said it would ensure a smooth transition to protect the district's interests. So some work continued after the termination notice.

At the November meeting, officials questioned the unusually high legal bill, with members calling it "appalling" and saying there was no excuse.

After the meeting, the district issued its usual "Board Briefs," which is a rundown of what happened. The legal bill issue was included, but the piece did not mention that the board voted against paying it.

"The Board expressed a desire to better understand the costs, and asked administrators to ensure accuracy of billed items within their departments prior to the Board's approval of the payment," the Board Briefs said.

Robbins Schwartz's managing attorney, Joseph Perkoski, couldn't be reached for immediate comment Friday.

Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.