Swampscott, Lynn King's Beach Town Hall To Discuss Next Steps After UV Pilot Program

SWAMPSCOTT, MA — Swampscott and Lynn municipal leaders will join representatives from Save the Habor/Save the Bay and engineers for a joint town forum on the future of King's Beach this week after a report on this summer's UV light treatment pilot program determined the water treatment method to be "effective and successful" under certain conditions.

The town hall will dive into the results of the pilot program, its potential to be scaled as a prolonged treatment method for sewage and stormwater, and potential next steps for the ultimate cleanup of one of Greater Boston's most polluted beaches.

The town hall is set for Wednesday afternoon at 4:30 at the Lynn Auditorium.

While the Kleinfelder engineering firm report determined that UV treatment "effectively treats day-to-day weather stormwater flows from the Lynn and Swampscott culverts," the path to a permanent treatment facility appears to remain daunting, and includes further testing on effectiveness during larger rain events, determining the site and necessities of a permanent facility and — perhaps most daunting of all — how to pay for any long-term treatment operation.

• 'Very Encouraged': Swampscott King's Beach UV Light Pilot Shows Promise, Raises Questions
• Swampscott Commits $300K To King's Beach UV Light Pilot Program
• Swampscott Weighs UV Light King's Beach Treatment Pilot Expense

"There are numerous operation and maintenance challenges that need to be addressed with engineering controls in the design of a permanent facility," the Kleinfelder analysis said.

The report concluded that UV treatment can reduce the number of days King's Beach is closed during a given summer season "even though there are other factors affecting beach closures beyond the discharges from the subject outfalls."

Kleinfelders aid both the city of Lynn and the town of Swampscott must determine whether to proceed with what could be a lengthy and expensive implementation process of a permanent facility.

It was recommended that a 12-month study be launched to understand how the treatment would work in varied weather conditions, that there be targeted "wet weather testing" because much of the testing this summer came during an abnormally dry season with few torrential rain events, and to analyze the sediment of material deposits in the Lynn and Swampscott culverts to test for bacteria and other contaminants.

It was also recommended that a feasibility study be commissioned to determine the preliminary design of a potential treatment facility, that Lynn and Swampscott engage regulators on the permitting hurdles of building such a facility, that discussions begin on where that facility would actually be located, and that the cost estimates of building and operating such a facility be refined to help determine viability.

Swampscott Select Board members at a meeting in February expressed concerns that, while the pilot program would likely prove some effectiveness, the overall implementation of that as a permanent fix to the century-old pollution problem would ultimately be cost-prohibitive without substantial state and federal funding for the project.

(Scott Souza is a Patch field editor covering Beverly, Danvers, Marblehead, Peabody, Salem and Swampscott. He can be reached at Scott.Souza@Patch.com. X/Twitter: @Scott_Souza.)