This post was contributed by a community member. The views expressed here are the author's own.

Neighbor News

Edison Election: ​Local Hotel Expenses Raise New Questions About Joshi Campaign Spending

Room Service or Room for Concern? Mayor Joshi's Campaign Hotel Costs Under Fire

Edison Election: ​Mayor Joshi’s Campaign Hotel Costs Under Fire
Edison Election: ​Mayor Joshi’s Campaign Hotel Costs Under Fire (Joshi Elec Reports)

Recent ELEC filings from Mayor Sam Joshi’s campaign show a series of questionable charges at the Courtyard by Marriott in Edison/Woodbridge. The total comes to $337.19 over two days in July 2023, with vague or blank descriptions.

Hotel stay in Edison Raises Questions
Hotel stays on the campaign’s dime in Joshi's own town. Edison deserves transparency, not taxpayer-funded room service.

The listed expenses are:

  • July 24 – $71.61 labeled “Food”
  • July 24 – $204.52 with no description
  • July 25 – $61.06 with no description

Campaigns sometimes pay for lodging when traveling to events or conferences, but the location and timing of these transactions raise serious questions. The Courtyard Edison/Woodbridge is only a few miles from Town Hall and from the mayor’s own home. There is no clear reason why the campaign would need hotel rooms in its own town, and the filings provide no explanation.

Find out what's happening in Edison-Metuchenfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

Under New Jersey election law, campaign funds may only be used for expenses that are “reasonably related to the conduct of an election campaign.” Overnight stays within the same municipality, restaurant tabs, and unitemized hotel charges should be clearly documented if they are legitimate campaign expenses.

The lack of detail is concerning, especially because other entries in the same report include full descriptions. That suggests the campaign knew how to classify ordinary expenses correctly but chose not to do so in this case.

Find out what's happening in Edison-Metuchenfor free with the latest updates from Patch.

Transparency advocates say vague filings weaken public trust in local government. When residents already have concerns about rising debt, insider contracts, and questionable spending, unclear campaign reports add to the frustration.

If these hotel stays were legitimate campaign events, the campaign should explain them. If not, they may reflect a pattern of careless or inappropriate spending that voters deserve to understand.

At a time when every contribution matters and every dollar is meant to advance the campaign’s message, residents are asking a simple question: Why was the mayor’s campaign paying for hotel stays just down the street?

The views expressed in this post are the author's own. Want to post on Patch?