Schools
No Cell Tower for Memorial School
BOE vice president tells concerned audience members the board will not pursue a cell tower near Memorial School as a way of helping the borough fend off litigation from Sprint.

The Paramus Board of Education will not pursue the placement of a cell tower near the location of Memorial School, an idea that had been presented to the board previously via the Planning Board attorney, as a move in trying to settle the borough’s legal matter with Sprint.
A large group of inquiring parents who filed into the auditorium at East Brook Middle School Monday applauded when Board of Ed Vice President Joanne G. Bergmann stated that the board had no plans to pursue this cell tower in the area of the elementary school.
Bergmann stated the item was not on the agenda for the meeting but through earlier discussion the consensus of the board was to not pursue the Planning Board attorney suggestion.
Find out what's happening in Paramusfor free with the latest updates from Patch.
According to a previous report, had the Board of Education agreed to take the cell tower it could have meant revenue for the district estimated at $90,000 to $100,000 and an end to pending litigation from Sprint, a case which is now said to be headed to federal court, according to the borough’s attorney Brian Giblin.
The borough has been fending off litigation from the cellular company for the past two years since the Zoning Board denied Sprint’s application to construct a cell tower at the ambulance building on Midland Avenue.
Find out what's happening in Paramusfor free with the latest updates from Patch.
Sprint had applied to the borough’s Zoning Board two times dating back as far as 2004. Both applications – one to build a monopole at the ambulance and a second to construct for a cell tower at the Church of Nazarene - were denied after 17 public hearings, ranging over a span of four years from 2005 to 2009.
Following that Sprint sued the borough for violating the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and the New Jersey Municipal Land Use Law; a summary judgement was heard in November 2010 which resulted in a split ruling for both parties.
Related stories
Cell Tower Litigation Remains in the Air; Board of Ed May Get Involved
Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.