Should Convicted Murderers Serve At Least Half of Sentence?

The Senate Judiciary Committee voted 8-0 on Thursday to approve legislation that would require an individual convicted of first or second degree murder to serve at least 50 percent of a sentence prior to being eligible for parole.

Sponsored by Sen. Leonidas P. Raptakis (D-Coventry, East Greenwich, West Greenwich), , would apply the 50 percent sentence rule those who have not been sentenced to life in prison. 

Senator Raptakis said that although he has introduced similar legislation in the past, the urgency for enacting such a law has become even more apparent this year as a result of the recent parole granted to Alfred A. Brissette Jr., who was granted parole after serving only 15 years of a 35 year sentence for the murder of a Woonsocket woman in 1999.

On the Middletown Patch Facebook page, most readers agreed with the legislation. 

"I agree....murderers should never have parole as an option," wrote Danielle Proulx.

Chris Kerwin said it depends on the type of murder. "We as people have the natural instinct to protect our loved ones at any expense, we as people make very stupid decisions,"  wrote Kerwin.

Among the examples Sen. Raptakis cited at the hearing was that of Andrew Jett, who was freed on parole after serving less than half of a 40-year sentence imposed on is for the 1992 killing of his girlfriend, Stephanie Oxendine. Mr. Jett served only 18 years of his 40-year sentence, and in August of 2012 he was brought into custody on charges that he murdered his new girlfriend, Michelle Busby.

The legislation will now be sent to the full Senate for consideration.

 
Do you think an individual convicted of murder should serve at least 50 percent of a sentence prior to being eligible for parole? Tell us in the comments section below!